Review



rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80  (Bio-Rad)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio-Rad is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Bio-Rad rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80
    Rat Anti Mouse Monoclonal F4 80, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 5807 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 96 stars, based on 5807 article reviews
    rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    TaKaRa rat monoclonal anti p cadherin
    Rat Monoclonal Anti P Cadherin, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rat monoclonal anti p cadherin/product/TaKaRa
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat monoclonal anti p cadherin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec pe conjugated rat monoclonal antibody against mouse pdgfrβ
    Pe Conjugated Rat Monoclonal Antibody Against Mouse Pdgfrβ, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/pe conjugated rat monoclonal antibody against mouse pdgfrβ/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe conjugated rat monoclonal antibody against mouse pdgfrβ - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80
    Rat Anti Mouse Monoclonal F4 80, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad rat monoclonal anti f4 80
    Rat Monoclonal Anti F4 80, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rat monoclonal anti f4 80/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat monoclonal anti f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad rat mab anti mouse cd206
    Rat Mab Anti Mouse Cd206, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rat mab anti mouse cd206/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat mab anti mouse cd206 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad rat mab anti mouse f4 80
    Rat Mab Anti Mouse F4 80, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rat mab anti mouse f4 80/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rat mab anti mouse f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bio-Rad mouse monoclonal igg2b anti γcya
    Mouse Monoclonal Igg2b Anti γcya, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal igg2b anti γcya/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal igg2b anti γcya - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Bio-Rad primary rat anti cd68 monoclonal antibody
    Histopathological characterization in BLM-treated animals (IN—5 mg/kg). A ) Histopathological evaluation by H&E staining (upper panel), Sirius Red staining (middle panel), and Masson’s trichrome (lower panel) of lungs of vehicle mice (CTR) or treated with BLM after a single IN administration. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 500 µm (upper panel) – 100 µm (lower panels). B ) IHC for Iba1 (left panel), <t>CD68</t> (green—middle panel), and α-SMA staining (right panel) of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported, scale bar = 100 µm. The boxed areas (Iba1 black, CD68 red, α-SMA green) in CTR and day 7 sections are shown at higher magnification in the right panel, scale bar = 50 µm. C) Histopathological quantification of Sirius Red staining in lung section (left graph) and representation of Ashcroft scale grade (right graph) obtained by Masson’s trichrome analysis of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Data are reported as mean ± SE. The data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, ** p ≤ 0.01. D ) mRNA expression of TNF-α, COL 1a1, and FN1 was evaluated by RT-qPCR in the lungs of mice ( n = 3 per group) treated with BLM and sacrificed at different time points. Genes were normalized on β-ACT, and the 2 −ΔΔCt method was employed for relative quantification on an external calibrator. Data are reported as mean ± SE and were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01. E ) SMAD 2/3 and pSMAD 2 expression in the lungs from CTR mouse at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of treatment obtained with WB
    Primary Rat Anti Cd68 Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary rat anti cd68 monoclonal antibody/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary rat anti cd68 monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Histopathological characterization in BLM-treated animals (IN—5 mg/kg). A ) Histopathological evaluation by H&E staining (upper panel), Sirius Red staining (middle panel), and Masson’s trichrome (lower panel) of lungs of vehicle mice (CTR) or treated with BLM after a single IN administration. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 500 µm (upper panel) – 100 µm (lower panels). B ) IHC for Iba1 (left panel), CD68 (green—middle panel), and α-SMA staining (right panel) of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported, scale bar = 100 µm. The boxed areas (Iba1 black, CD68 red, α-SMA green) in CTR and day 7 sections are shown at higher magnification in the right panel, scale bar = 50 µm. C) Histopathological quantification of Sirius Red staining in lung section (left graph) and representation of Ashcroft scale grade (right graph) obtained by Masson’s trichrome analysis of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Data are reported as mean ± SE. The data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, ** p ≤ 0.01. D ) mRNA expression of TNF-α, COL 1a1, and FN1 was evaluated by RT-qPCR in the lungs of mice ( n = 3 per group) treated with BLM and sacrificed at different time points. Genes were normalized on β-ACT, and the 2 −ΔΔCt method was employed for relative quantification on an external calibrator. Data are reported as mean ± SE and were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01. E ) SMAD 2/3 and pSMAD 2 expression in the lungs from CTR mouse at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of treatment obtained with WB

    Journal: BMC Pulmonary Medicine

    Article Title: Optimization of intranasal bleomycin dose for effective pulmonary fibrosis induction in mice with minimal animal distress

    doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-04001-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Histopathological characterization in BLM-treated animals (IN—5 mg/kg). A ) Histopathological evaluation by H&E staining (upper panel), Sirius Red staining (middle panel), and Masson’s trichrome (lower panel) of lungs of vehicle mice (CTR) or treated with BLM after a single IN administration. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 500 µm (upper panel) – 100 µm (lower panels). B ) IHC for Iba1 (left panel), CD68 (green—middle panel), and α-SMA staining (right panel) of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported, scale bar = 100 µm. The boxed areas (Iba1 black, CD68 red, α-SMA green) in CTR and day 7 sections are shown at higher magnification in the right panel, scale bar = 50 µm. C) Histopathological quantification of Sirius Red staining in lung section (left graph) and representation of Ashcroft scale grade (right graph) obtained by Masson’s trichrome analysis of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Data are reported as mean ± SE. The data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, ** p ≤ 0.01. D ) mRNA expression of TNF-α, COL 1a1, and FN1 was evaluated by RT-qPCR in the lungs of mice ( n = 3 per group) treated with BLM and sacrificed at different time points. Genes were normalized on β-ACT, and the 2 −ΔΔCt method was employed for relative quantification on an external calibrator. Data are reported as mean ± SE and were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01. E ) SMAD 2/3 and pSMAD 2 expression in the lungs from CTR mouse at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of treatment obtained with WB

    Article Snippet: For subcellular localization, primary rat anti-CD68 monoclonal antibody (1:200, Serotec, Kidlington, UK) + Triton X-100 0.1% + NGS 3% in 1X PBS overnight at 4 °C was used.

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Quantitative Proteomics

    Histopathological characterization in BLM-treated animals (IN—3 mg/kg). A Histopathological evaluation by H&E staining (upper panel), Sirius Red staining (middle panel), and Masson’s trichrome (lower panel) of lungs of vehicle mice (CTR) or treated with BLM after a single IN administration. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 500 µm (upper panel) – 100 µm (lower panels). B IHC for Iba1 (left panel), CD68 (green—middle panel), and α-SMA staining (right panel) of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 100 µm. The boxed areas (Iba1 black, CD68 red, α-SMA green) in CTR and day 7 sections are shown at higher magnification in the right panel, scale bar = 50 µm C ) Histopathological quantification of Sirius Red staining in lung section (left graph) and representation of Ashcroft scale grade (right graph) obtained by Masson’s trichrome analysis of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Data are reported as mean ± SE. The data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. D ) mRNA expression of TNF-α, COL 1a1, and FN1 was evaluated by RT-qPCR in the lungs of mice ( n = 3 per group) treated with BLM and sacrificed at different time points. Genes were normalized on β-actin, and the 2 −ΔΔCt method was employed for relative quantification on an external calibrator. Data are reported as mean ± SE and were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01. E) SMAD 2/3 and pSMAD 2 expression in the lungs from CTR mouse at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of treatment obtained with WB

    Journal: BMC Pulmonary Medicine

    Article Title: Optimization of intranasal bleomycin dose for effective pulmonary fibrosis induction in mice with minimal animal distress

    doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-04001-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Histopathological characterization in BLM-treated animals (IN—3 mg/kg). A Histopathological evaluation by H&E staining (upper panel), Sirius Red staining (middle panel), and Masson’s trichrome (lower panel) of lungs of vehicle mice (CTR) or treated with BLM after a single IN administration. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 500 µm (upper panel) – 100 µm (lower panels). B IHC for Iba1 (left panel), CD68 (green—middle panel), and α-SMA staining (right panel) of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Representative images of lung sections of animals sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the treatment are reported. Scale bar = 100 µm. The boxed areas (Iba1 black, CD68 red, α-SMA green) in CTR and day 7 sections are shown at higher magnification in the right panel, scale bar = 50 µm C ) Histopathological quantification of Sirius Red staining in lung section (left graph) and representation of Ashcroft scale grade (right graph) obtained by Masson’s trichrome analysis of lungs of CTR or treated with BLM. Data are reported as mean ± SE. The data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001. D ) mRNA expression of TNF-α, COL 1a1, and FN1 was evaluated by RT-qPCR in the lungs of mice ( n = 3 per group) treated with BLM and sacrificed at different time points. Genes were normalized on β-actin, and the 2 −ΔΔCt method was employed for relative quantification on an external calibrator. Data are reported as mean ± SE and were analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Significant differences compared to the CTR are reported, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01. E) SMAD 2/3 and pSMAD 2 expression in the lungs from CTR mouse at days 7, 14, 21, and 28 of treatment obtained with WB

    Article Snippet: For subcellular localization, primary rat anti-CD68 monoclonal antibody (1:200, Serotec, Kidlington, UK) + Triton X-100 0.1% + NGS 3% in 1X PBS overnight at 4 °C was used.

    Techniques: Staining, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Quantitative Proteomics